New Haven and London: Yale University Press.īerkman Center Report. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Washington, D.C.: RAND Report Series.īenkler, Y. On distributed communications: Twelve volumes.
Journal of Historical Sociology, 1(1), 58–89.īabbie, E.
Notes on the difficulty of studying the state.
INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE IETF HOW TO
We conclude by presenting some initial recommendations on how to ensure that work carried out by the IETF may enable human rights.Ībbate, J. Third, the IETF should enable the actualisation of human rights through the protocols and standards it designs by implementing a responsibility-by-design approach to engineering. Second, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), one of the most influential SDOs, has a moral obligation to ensure its work is coherent with, and fosters, human rights. First, SDOs’ work is inherently political. In this article, we contribute to the debate on SDOs’ ethical responsibility to bring their work in line with human rights. They rearrange the shape of the technically mediated public sphere, including which rights it protects and which practices it enables. The technical decisions made by Internet Standard Developing Organisations (SDOs) that build and maintain the technical infrastructure of the Internet influences how information flows. This debate often focuses on Internet governance from a regulatory perspective, underestimating the influence and power of the governance of the Internet’s architecture. The debate on whether and how the Internet can protect and foster human rights has become a defining issue of our time.
0 kommentar(er)
